Compare and contrast learning by doing to learning by reading. In your opinion, which is better? Explain.
Ever since we are born in this world, we have been learning our entire life. When we were infant, we learned how to walk and eat. And also today when we are adults, our leaning has never stopped.
We are leaning something new everyday to tackle our life. Learning is a great way to improve our knowledge and we can learn either from reading books or working practically. Some people believe that learning by reading books are more effective rather than learning by doing. However, I believe that learning by doing is a better way.
To begin with, learning by doing helps us learn better. When we simply read books and try to learn, we could never understand the fundamental. By doing we can get the better meaning and practical knowledge which is far better than simply scamming the book. We can remember better with practical leaning since we are practically implementing the subject thereby we can remember much better. On the other hand, learning with books we are more likely to forget what we read. For instance, when I was attending my dental anatomy classes during my undergraduation in dental school, I could never understand because our professor would simply read from the text book. However, I could understand much better when my professor would teach us showing everything in human cadaver during the practical classes. Thus, I understood my subject so well that I always do practical study rather than merely reading a book. There is no doubt, there are more example, but my story clearly shows the importance of studying practically.
Whats more, studying by doing or working is always intriguing. Whereas, studying by reading a book is boring and time taking. Although, I believe that we can learn a lot and gain a sufficient information with books but books are boring and difficult to understand. Again, the example my undergraduation days, when I was in third year, before we treat patients, we have to practice on dental tooth models. Thus, It always fastinated me that root canal treatment on the dental models is an awesome way to learn. I could perform much better simply working on it. Had I been just reading books and directly treating patients without practical knowledge, I would not be confident and interested. This my practical knowledge has huge role in keeping my goals and aims focused than just reading books.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...stopped. We are leaning something new everyday to tackle our life. Learning is a great...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... with, learning by doing helps us learn better. When we simply read books and try to l...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 671, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...simply read from the text book. However, I could understand much better when my p...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... importance of studying practically. Whats more, studying by doing or working is a...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 612, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...just reading books and directly treating patients without practical knowledge, I ...
^^
Line 6, column 771, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ole in keeping my goals and aims focused than just reading books.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, third, thus, well, whereas, for instance, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89473684211 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60769204251 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486215538847 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6212473657 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.375 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234817046336 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951071189127 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932506966579 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17754776512 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838543431904 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.