Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's sophisticated world, there are multiple news means that we can easily find it. All though some of my colleagues assert that it is always safer to obtain the information from only certain news resources, however, I disagree with them, I believe that it is essential to refer to diverse information sources in order to stay well informed for a few reasons that I will discuss below.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that relying on particular news resources is highly risky. Chances are high that they print or telecast the fake news only to promote their source. Such a particular situation is extremely common these days. For instance, there are a few news channels or newspapers, which are linked to some political parties. Therefore, they never leave the chance to promote the news related to the party, and sometimes, they do not telecast the news which criticizes the party. As a result of this, to be highly informed, one should not just rely on a singular source, they should watch and read multiple news and information. A study at Harvard University has revealed that 30% of people focusing on sole sources of information have only half news about the incidents.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that viewing a single source can be misleading. For example, during my sophomore year, I almost missed my deadline to submit my essay. So, I didn't have much time left therefore, I penned down the article by just reflying on a single column. Later on, my professor discovered that I have written down old data which is rarely practiced nowadays. Eventually, I have realized that we are living in a world that is under constant change, so we should be matched to such changes by staying updated with newer information. Consequently, it is exceedingly important to look for multiple resources to stay updated and to avoid being misled by old news.
In conclusion, I believe to be well informed, a person should obtain information via various resources because relying on just one source can be deeply dangerous and because it can deceive by keeping us lag in this rapidly evolving world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-25 | minammah | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-25 | minammah | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2022-07-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2022-06-12 | nida fatima | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Movies and books can reflect the ideas and the spirit of a particular period What have you learned about a place or its peo ple from watching films or reading books Use specific examples and details to support your response 45
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- which is more important to a student as subject math and science or art and literature. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only do what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: ALLTHOUGH[2]
Message: Did you mean 'although'?
Suggestion: Although
... news means that we can easily find it. All though some of my colleagues assert that it is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...d my deadline to submit my essay. So, I didnt have much time left therefore, I penned...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, look, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84594594595 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67426798897 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556756756757 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7034010233 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0625 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197363029535 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055369466811 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059348261807 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1279526018 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592413172906 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.