Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Many people provide a firm opinion about whether the television advertising directed towards the juvenile shouold be allowed to should not. Therefore, it is a subject of intense debate in topday's globe. As far as I am legitimately concerned, I genuinely believe that young children should not be allowed towards any sort of advertisement. To elaborate more on this specific topic, the following reasons and examples will be provided.
The most significant conspicuous reason to justify my point of view is that juveniles are not mature enough to differenciate between the fake and reality. What I mean is that most of the children are puzzled and are easily confused with the advertisements that they witness in tv. Most of the time, children assume that advertisement are truely real and they would believe them undoubtly. My life experience set a compelling example of what I mean. Whean I was young, I used to readily believe that chocolate that they would show in the television add, as huge and filled with extra ceramel and waffles, but when my dear mom bought the one for me, I was extremely dissapointed with my expectation of what I saw in television advertisement. From that day, my mother expalined me about the adds are just simply a lie to lure kids.
Second reasons to substantiate and indicate my standpoint is that behaviours of children would highly affected by the televison advertisement. Put differently, they would most likely to follow whatever they see on television and somtimes would lead to dangerous behavior. For instance, a couple of years back, a very famous tv cartoon advertisement about a boy who could fly and travel most of places was shown, But soon many children were seen acting as that cartoon boy that they jumped from building thinking that they could fly too like the tv cartoon boy. Hence, many children were found dead and the advertisement was blocked soon after.
In conclusion, reasons ofthe reasons mentioned above, I strongly believe that children shouldnot be
directed towards advertisement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is specific topic, the following reasons and examples will be provided. The ...
^^
Line 5, column 784, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m that day, my mother expalined me about the adds are just simply a lie to lure k...
^^
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
...hat behaviours of children would highly affected by the televison advertisement. Put dif...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 387, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the places') or simply say ''most places''.
Suggestion: most of the places; most places
...nt about a boy who could fly and travel most of places was shown, But soon many children were ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Directed
...ly believe that children shouldnot be directed towards advertisement.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, second, so, therefore, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09467455621 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9223896013 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556213017751 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5464248977 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216610814247 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780037442575 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606020987448 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142319164346 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635781979391 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.