Consider a situation where you are asked by your supervisor to work with one of your co-workers on a project. This co-worker has opinions that are very different from yours and they feel very strongly about these opinions. Do you think this is a good idea? Use reasons and examples to support your answer.
Most people think it is better if companies consider their employees' opinions to make crucial decisions. But, these people have been depressed when their supervisors tell them their opinions are incorrect or not appropriate. However, personally, I believe that it could be a good idea if a manager considers all of its employees' opinion and then choose one as a better idea. Therefore, I do not feel bad when I tell my opinion, but my co-worker and other people in my office have another opinion better than mine. I think this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, it is worthy to note that having an opinion and examining it is the best way to learn how to become a good advisor. In fact, people should try to make an opinion, whether it is wrong or correct, then learn from their mistakes and improve their skills. My experience is a compelling illustration of this. I have worked in a software programming company as a technical manager and a senior developer. The first time I started working, I had no idea how important it is to make a decision in the vital situations of our projects. My manager at that time decided to allow us to think about our technical problems and give him our possible solutions. After two years, I have obtained much experience and have the best insight into solving software-based issues. Moreover, these experiences help me to find a better job opportunity.
Furthermore, the hierarchical management system that makes managing a company easier can help companies make the best decisions. In fact, these kinds of companies prefer to use brainstorming to find an idea instead of using just one's opinion. For instance, assume a company with hundred employees and ten managers. In this company, the employees have the power to write their opinion about every critical decision that can affect the entire company. Their opinion letters are gathered and sent to local managers. They examine each thought and send some of the best ideas to their following manager. In the end, the central manager has a list of good opinions that can help him to make a better decision. This management system can also help the company give credit to employees and grow their talents and skills to make them efficient employees.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that there is no problem if my manager and other co-workers decide to consider another opinion instead of mine. Moreover, I see this kind of situation as an opportunity to improve my skills. I would therefore recommend this approach to other people as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 800, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help me find' instead.
Suggestion: help me find
...sed issues. Moreover, these experiences help me to find a better job opportunity. Furthermore,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...on. For instance, assume a company with hundred employees and ten managers. In this com...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84126984127 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72008673928 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49433106576 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0214240787 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.9583333333 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54166666667 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214206320266 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637476112491 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433022168479 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148988994934 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488039224252 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.