Imagine that you have been asked by your supervisor to work with one of your co-workers on a project. This co-worker has opinions that are very different than yours and they feel very strongly about these opinions. Do you think this is a good idea? Use reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are always challenges to collaborate with colleagues on important projects.one of the most controversial topics is that we work with people who hold strongly different viewpoints. Personally I believe that it is completely beneficial for us. The following paragraph will aptly substantiate my viewpoint.
first of all, these coworkers sometimes give practical solutions for problems that we might not come up with these ideas. each person has his own unique ideas so when we have a variety of opinions, we will have a wide range of solutions for the project. Thus, we can choose the best one. My own experience can help to demonstrate it. when I graduated from university, I took a part-time job as a tutor. At that time one of my students had a bad accident and she couldn't attend her classes. two teachers and I strongly believed that she should eliminate that semester, however, one of my colleagues was against this idea and he thought it costs lots of money for her, and she will lose the opportunity of being graduating on time. Then my colleges proposed that she could take online courses instead. it was a great idea.
Discussion with a variety of opinions also gives chances to figure out all aspects of a problem that we may don't pay attention to them. when all groups have the same ideas the chance of making mistakes will increase because we don't see the problem in all conditions especially in the positions that contrast with our opinions. For instance, my brother worked for a construction company that wants to build a dam on a river. One of the senior managers opposed this plan. When he was asked the reasons for contradictions, he explained that he was from that region and he grew up near this river. So if they built the dam, all areas would be under the water. After much research, finally, he found that this area has a soil mass of salt. As a result, if they build this dam, the water of the dam completely become salty. In the end, the company changed the place of the dam and found a better zone. This example demonstrates that if there wasn't anyone to hold a different view of the plan and all of them only focused on the advantages of the building dam they couldn't find out the high potential risks.
In conclusion, I contend that working with people who share opposing views has great advantages. Because they sometimes give better solutions and because we can see all aspects of a problem that decline the chances of making mistakes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'collaborating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: collaborating
There are always challenges to collaborate with colleagues on important projects.o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
... will aptly substantiate my viewpoint. first of all, these coworkers sometimes give ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Each
... we might not come up with these ideas. each person has his own unique ideas so when...
^^^^
Line 2, column 462, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... my students had a bad accident and she couldnt attend her classes. two teachers and I ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Two
...ent and she couldnt attend her classes. two teachers and I strongly believed that s...
^^^
Line 2, column 800, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... she could take online courses instead. it was a great idea. Discussion with a ...
^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ut all aspects of a problem that we may dont pay attention to them. when all groups ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...that we may dont pay attention to them. when all groups have the same ideas the chan...
^^^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...aking mistakes will increase because we dont see the problem in all conditions espec...
^^^^
Line 4, column 937, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...This example demonstrates that if there wasnt anyone to hold a different view of the ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1059, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...the advantages of the building dam they couldnt find out the high potential risks. In ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69885057471 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64878666849 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537931034483 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8875203472 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1666666667 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125276046008 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349354980024 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271163270078 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717479390071 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245790224563 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.