Decisions can be made quickly, or they can be made after careful thought. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The decisions that people make quickly are always wrong. Use reasons and specific examples to support your opinion.
Making a decision is a hard process for all people. While some people make their decision after carefully thinking, others make these decisions quickly. However, it is a very definite judgement that the decisions which are made quickly are always wrong. I do not agree this statement for two reasons which I will explain in the following essay.
The first reason is that people often decide quickly on a subject they are experienced before because they have gained experience on this subject; therefore, they do not need to think while people are taking a decision. For example, Chief Executive Officers have to make decision quickly to gain profit for their business when exchange alters since their companies compete with many companies. Moreover, it which is quick win in the business life. If making a decision quickly were always wrong, there would be no company left. As a result, people should not think that taking a decision quickly is always wrong.
The second reason is that people decide quickly when their lives or another person's life is in danger. They just focus on saving their lives or life of another person in this situation. That is way, they do not think carefully before making the decision, and they act directly. For example, if an individual is hiking in a jungle. After a long hike, he rests on a rock to drink some water. He hears sound of grass rustling behind him. His instantaneous decision to run away from the source of sound might prove to be beneficial, if it is some carnivore that's walking through the grass. Even if there is no carnivore, he could not know this before seeing it which is source of sound. Hence, this helps me form a judgement that not all decisions that people make quickly are wrong.
To sum up, I rebut this statement that The decisions that people make quickly are always wrong because it is a very certain judgement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 77, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ide quickly when their lives or another persons life is in danger. They just focus on s...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 554, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... be beneficial, if it is some carnivore thats walking through the grass. Even if ther...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for example, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79447852761 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39110577018 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503067484663 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5809178298 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2631578947 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1578947368 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342476986883 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110020701034 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818874087418 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236285747016 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069048331374 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.