Decisions can be made quickly, or they can be made after careful thought. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The decisions that people make quickly are always wrong. Use reasons and specific examples to support your opinion.
Decisions are very important part of our lives, be it personal decisions or work-related decisions. They are integral part of any process, as availability of different choices elicits us to decide on which to choose. Decisions can be made quickly, or they can be made after careful thinking, and different people will have different opinions whether quick decisions are always wrong. In my view, I can't fully agree or disagree with the given statement for two important reasons.
First, we can't say that all the decisions taken quickly are wrong. There are different situations where quick decisions are better than deliberating and debating. In these times, taking any decision would be beneficial than investing time in judging different parameters and how they influence the outcome. For example, if an individual is hiking in a jungle. After a long hike, he rests on a rock to drink some water. He hears sound of grass rustling behind him. His instantaneous decision to run away from the source of sound might prove to be beneficial, if it is some carnivore that's walking through the grass. Even if there is no carnivore, his decision to run away is beneficial as there is no surety from the start, that it isn't a carnivore. Hence, this helps me form a judgement that not all decisions that people make quickly are wrong.
Second, decisions made in haste lacks information about the situation and can render them as wrong. Carefully thought decisions have more information regarding the situation. More information about a situation is beneficial in deciding what should we choose and how it benefits us. This factor makes careful decisions more correct, and quick decisions less correct. Taking an example from corporate sector, quick and hasty decisions can bring about collapse or loss of corporations. A coglomerate in India suffered a huge loss due to hasty decision by its new CEO. The company had a choice to either buy raw materials before or after the festival season. The CEO didn't consider all the possibilities and forced the company to buy raw materials before festival season. However, after festival season the price dropped because of excess availability. The company had to suffer loss as compared to their competitors. Decisions made in haste lack proper consideration and evaluation of the situation, increasing possibility of them being wrong. Hence, careful decisions are better than quick decisions, and quick decisions can be wrong most times.
In summary, full agreement on the statement can't be reached. As quick decisions can bring benefit and are correct in certain situations, they can also be wrong due to lack of information while making decisions. I would suggest that in time-constrained situations, quick decisions are better, but not in any other situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...cisions are always wrong. In my view, I cant fully agree or disagree with the given ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...for two important reasons. First, we cant say that all the decisions taken quickl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... be beneficial, if it is some carnivore thats walking through the grass. Even if ther...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...re is no surety from the start, that it isnt a carnivore. Hence, this helps me form ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 664, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e or after the festival season. The CEO didnt consider all the possibilities and forc...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ummary, full agreement on the statement cant be reached. As quick decisions can brin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, so, while, for example, in summary, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2350.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15350877193 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83950159599 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510964912281 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 740.7 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9819730337 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9285714286 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2857142857 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.67857142857 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436222993932 0.236089414692 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110637065971 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113719108699 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286419573753 0.150856017488 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889210113868 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.