Do you agree or disagree that environmental problems like pollution will improve and get better in the future?
Hectic life has a tremendous impact on our life. Many people are widening their knowledge in order to survive in this life. From my vantage point, I believe that the environment problems will reduce for the following reasons.
To begin with, the technology is advanced in many countries, especially in industrial countries, For instance, Many industrial cities are start to use electric cars, which are working depend on erchargible batteries. These cars do not need fuel to work. As a result, the harmful gases will reduce in our environment. On the other hand, in the developing countries, they are still using regular cars, which are working depend on gasolin. These vehcals produce carbon dioxide. This gas has a deletrious impact on our environment. Moreover, many people are stoping from using harmful products like plastic bags. They are consuming paper bags to reduce the dangerous influence for these products. Also, in many advanced countries, they begin to make resorbable bags. These friendships environment product are dissolving in water. As a result, after few years, Many countries will utilize these product in order to reduce the pollution.
Finally, widening people health information will has a big impact on out environment. Many individuals have a lot information about a negative impact of using harmful products. For instance, social media, internet, TV, and also phone, can provide humans with a lot of knowledge. Today, many tv's programs explain about impact CO2 gas on people health. It can cause many diseases. Therefore, population will not cosume harmfuls products in oredr to protect themself. On the other hand, Before people did not have any idea about pollution and impacted co2 gas in their wellness because the life and techonolgy did not advanced like today.
To wrap it up, our environment will improve in next years because people have a ot of information and the techology is advenced
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 241, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to fuel'?
Suggestion: to fuel
...gible batteries. These cars do not need fuel to work. As a result, the harmful gases...
^^^^
Line 6, column 770, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'friendships'' or 'friendship's'?
Suggestion: friendships'; friendship's
...ey begin to make resorbable bags. These friendships environment product are dissolving in w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 885, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this product' or 'these products'?
Suggestion: this product; these products
... few years, Many countries will utilize these product in order to reduce the pollution. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 50, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...widening people health information will has a big impact on out environment. Many i...
^^^
Line 9, column 616, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'advance'
Suggestion: advance
...because the life and techonolgy did not advanced like today. To wrap it up, our env...
^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 79, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...prove in next years because people have a ot of information and the techology is ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25080385852 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71468342633 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520900321543 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8470275351 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.2272727273 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1363636364 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101211248944 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317794910738 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383958532227 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648670304279 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00945190566283 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.