do you agree or disagree with the following statement? the ability to maintain friendships with the small number of people our long period of time is more important happiness than the ability to make new friends easily.use specific reasons and example to support your answer.
Needless to say, one of the most important things in human life, because of its impact on all aspects of individuals' personal and social lives, is happiness. Therefore, all people have always been trying to do works which glad them. In this regard, some people believe that having ling time friendships with fewer individuals is more important for happiness than make many new friends. I agree with this view and I will discuss my reasons in the following paragraphs.
Some people believe that new personalities which individuals can get familiar via making new friendships are the most important reason to be happy. Such people wrongly believe that when individuals make new friendships they will face new worldviews and lifestyles that are so interesting for them; consequently, their mind produce dopamine that will make them happier. Therefore, these people have posed that in order to be happiness individuals have to make new friendships during their lives. I disagree with this approach because this type of happiness is temporary and after short time making new friendships will become repetitive thing for individuals and they will not feel happy by making new friendships. You can take my cousin as the best example for this case. He used to make many friendships with different individuals and he was so happy, but now he usually feels depression and even he does not have passion to talk with his parents. Thus, making new friendships cannot help individuals to be happy.
Strong relationships are the most important factor to happy life. This topic has been discussed by several psychologists that the majority of them believe that individuals usually need to talk about their problems with other people, because sharing these problems will help individuals to feel relaxed and find suitable solutions for them and individuals can share their problems with individuals who they know for a long time and have strong relationships. Hence these psychologists believe that having longtime friendships with fewer people in order to share your problems with them is more important than making new friendships with new individuals in order to have happy life. I agree with this approach, because individuals can share their problems with individuals who they truth them and generating truth among individuals is time-consuming process. By way of illustration, I can refer to some statistics which have been published by several international organizations. Based on these statistics approximately all people who have strong relationships with fewer individuals have happier lives than other people. Thus, strong relationships help individuals to have happier lives.
In brief, as I discussed in the previous paragraphs, some people believe that maintaining relationships with fewer people is more important than making new friendships with different individuals in order to be happy. I argued that this view is correct for a couple of reasons. First, making new friendships will be recitative for individuals and they will not feel happy after short time, second, strong relationships help individuals to share their sense which is so useful to have happy life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: LING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'long'?
Suggestion: long
...regard, some people believe that having ling time friendships with fewer individuals...
^^^^
Line 4, column 458, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ong time and have strong relationships. Hence these psychologists believe that having...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which is so useful to have happy life.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2675.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32868525896 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93975651684 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.392430278884 0.524837075471 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 806.4 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.7538730853 48.9658058833 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.380952381 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9047619048 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52380952381 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259676594677 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105816300278 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081157223384 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207453078269 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287115116161 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.