Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, friendship relations among people play a paramount role in daily life and it is a crucial point in every individual's experience. After families' relations which is a most important relationship among people, it is most important for the person and society in a second step, if society is interpreted as a wall, the friendship relation is bricks of the wall. In my perspective, the ability to friendships with a small, long span, and more sophisticated relation is the best choice and I prefer to maintain the first one which points in the letter.
First of all, the main reason is that the quality of relationships more important than the quantity of it. The quality of her or his friends will be directly affected their relationship status. If one chooses and collects good friends among verities of friends that person which he or she can choose, consequently this choice makes a staunch relationship among friends in the future. for instance, when I was in university I used to pick naughty friends to make fun in during class time, then I realized in semester late, I completely was in a wrong path, One day I have decided to change my attitude toward friendships relation and how I would be choosing a good person which may help me toward success in the university graduation, then, I choose the most successful person in the university which her name was Mohamad, he inspires me to competition with herself, this competition was an advantageous fear to lose inside me and I always tried to best out of me and I push my limited, in series of competition I could be a top-ranked person in my college. Therefore, the quality of personal characteristics that make better friendships in the future more important than that friendship with a lot of people that ones do not know how the friends in such a friendship have an idiosyncrasy and special habit that does not like it.
Second, the other reason is the time which one takes, if a person focuses on small friends number, he or she knows better each person's characteristics and idiosyncrasy and choose a more reliable person to hang out with them.
For instance, I have 3 friends in my life ever, we go camping in the desert, jungle, mountain every weekend, we do not need to talk to each other about the schedule and requirements of camping on the trip, because we learn our duty in passing time.
Additionally, when each of us gets in trouble, we help immediately without one word saying. A friend who came from a casual place without knowing me for a long time, who I would like to call them a casual friend, is very likely not a person who understands me.
In sum, not only the smallest of friends circle is not scarcity, but also it is an opportunity to recognize true friends in our life which leads to satisfaction and happiness in friendships, relationships, notwithstanding, to have many friends satisfy the feeling of confidence in every person. Besides, the quality and time that we spend our time with friends more important for happiness than another factor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...lationship among friends in the future. for instance, when I was in university I us...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2519.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 528.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77083333333 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91074701814 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465909090909 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 782.1 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.1344086022 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 142.171300098 48.9658058833 290% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.928571429 100.406767564 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.7142857143 20.6045352989 183% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248428234699 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097882393387 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721624395731 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125865766815 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521430761663 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 11.7677419355 169% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 58.1214874552 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.1575268817 162% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.0537634409 167% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.