Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All scientific discoveries should be shared around the world. Government should not keep it privately.
As we all know that several scientific discoveries happened in the history, such as the find of x-ray enabling docters to clearly find out cause of disease before surgery, can drastically change the world. Therefore, some people may believe that government should not keep those discoveries privately owing to their beneficial influence, but it is not an opinion to which I subscribe. Instead, I am of the opinion that whether scientific discoveries should be shared around the world has to be discussed case by case.
In the first place, it is undeniable that many scientific discoveries need being shared because they may be able to improve humans' living condition all around the world. However, it would be too absolute to suggest that all those scientific discoveries have to be shared without any reserve.
Furthermore, large amount of money and time have to be spent before a scientific discovery appear, which means that it will be somewhat unfair for the company who succeed in making this to find all in vain if sharing it generously. Moreover, to make things even worse, viewing the bad consequence making no profit, other constitutes may stop doing such money-wasting experiments in exploring unknown scientific possibilities, as a result of which the world will stop progressing. A good to illustrate of this is the story of a pharmaceutical company. Discovering one new drug requires complex steps, from theoretical research, compound synthesizing, active subtance sifting to pharmacological evaluation, all of which force researchers to spend countless time and energy on managing them. After succeeding in making the new drug, unless the company can sell its drug at a high price recovering its previous cost will it go bankrupt immediately. However, if the company is asked to share its precious recipe, not only will it be likely to run our of money, but also stops other company to invest on technology researching anymore in the future.
Besides, relating to the field in national defense, scientific discoveries are less likely to be shared considering the neccessity of guarding nation security and some possible fatal consequences brought by dangerness of technology. Especially at the era of technology and science, military force is stongly relevant to the nation's standing among the world. For example, only a few countries among the world own the nuclear technolgy and each of them manages to explore it individually. As you can see, on the one hand, this technology helps countries to guard their sovereignty, but on the other hand, it is also a theat to humans' health owing to its fatal nature. Image that if the technology is being shared, it is likely that some countries may be unable to control their behavior and randomly use the weapon, as a result of which the outcome can be problematic as great amount of people dying and natural environmnet being polluted by radioactivity.
In sum, while sharing technology can sometimes provide optimized benefit and expand scientific technology, it may lead to economic loss and human death.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mong the world own the nuclear technolgy and each of them manages to explore it i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, such as, as a result, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2571.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15230460922 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95345776326 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537074148297 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 818.1 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.6671589704 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.235294118 100.406767564 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3529411765 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94117647059 5.45110844103 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290343724206 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092279533645 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844059867644 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170543944042 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104980108412 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 11.7677419355 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.