History gathers changes from every society into it. In other words, history tells us about the people in any period of time and also their culture, their inventions and influences. This recorded information imbues us with huge insight about the contemporary world. It comprises progress of previous generations, in detail, that might help mankind to progress forward. In my view, I think history should include, not only about medieval kings, geographic landscapes but also recent information since the dawn of electronic boom. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will elaborate on in the following paragraphs.
First of all, every student studying has to imbibe at least a part of history which is relevant to his field. Although fields like archaeology includes its historical progress, fields like computer science should also include information regarding its birth and growth till date. Likewise, every architect should have the knowledge of prior construction and its relation with cultures, over the course of history. Seeing from this perspective, every field, however new, might have sprung from a field with some earlier work. This work can be included as course in the curriculum. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. During my college, a lecturer of one of my computer science courses, had told us about the birth of computers and its progress till date. This had increased interest in many, motivating them to study more. Similarly, it would be helpful for entrepreneurs to know about the recent changes in laws and regulations that are endowed on technological companies.
Secondly, studying history in detail might provide great insights. For instance, a start up founder having the knowledge of how all prior start ups have been faring in the industry might succeed better. Although the conditions are not same, as they change with time, but knowing such things helps one to plan for a better future. The person might predict the future predicaments, be ready with a plan to tackle them and progress forward. All these information, if included in a course, might ingrain students with technical as well as practical knowledge. Inclusion of such courses also does not impose any cost burden on the university. Because teaching the history does not require a lot of expertise, any teacher with authentic information can be able to teach such courses.
In conclusion, some might think inclusion of such courses might be a burden imposed on students additionally, but in reality, the opposite is true. Learning history, particularly about a field, might increase motivation causing them to do well to improve their knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...istory tells us about the people in any period of time and also their culture, their invention...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...o tackle them and progress forward. All these information, if included in a course, might ingrain...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, well, as to, at least, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22610722611 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77188621084 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561771561772 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1393946034 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4166666667 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.45110844103 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178590534552 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515816040607 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318052463342 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109086163439 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206380381417 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.