Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
History is one of the most important fields of study that absorb so many people every year to be an expert on it. Some universities forced student, even if history is not their major, to take history courses. There is a heated controversy on this, while lots of students believe that when they are learning other fields, they should not force to present in history classes. I, personally, agree with the latter opinion. In the following paragraphs, I explain my reasons to clarify my viewpoint.
The first reason coming to my mind is that history classes will waste other major studies students' time. Students have limited time in the week to fill their class-time schedule. When a student's field is not history, he can enrolls in other courses that are more effective for him. The students should pay much attention when they are choosing their lessons because when they want to find a job, it will be helpful for them that have been passed as related courses as possible. For example, when an engineer wants to apply for a work position, he should introduce all of his passed courses and their grades. The more related courses one passed, the more chance will has to get the job; while history does not account any positive point for him.
Another reason coming to my mind is that the students are overwhelmed with their courses and having unrelated courses like history will be monotonous for them. Students should opt in the field which they like to study. Listening to presentations about the phenomenon that they do not like would make them tired about the process of learning. For instance, engineers courses are so mathematical and they always should remember formulas. If they want to pass some history courses that do not contain any formulas; it would be very tough for them. In this regard, they also may not concentrate on their essentials.
To sum up, based on the aforementioned paragraphs, forcing all the students to pass the history courses not only will waste their valuable time but also might make them tired and exhausted of learning. Is not it better that universities let the students choose their courses based on their favors by themselves?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'presenting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: presenting
...ing other fields, they should not force to present in history classes. I, personally, agre...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'enroll'
Suggestion: enroll
...a students field is not history, he can enrolls in other courses that are more effectiv...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 667, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...ourses one passed, the more chance will has to get the job; while history does not ...
^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...ed and exhausted of learning. Is not it better that universities let the students choo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48967615752 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498652291105 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3231860516 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8421052632 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5263157895 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26315789474 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260084519457 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930288259758 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454217038387 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176835227041 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282059122975 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.