Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, many YouTubers or entertainers are reproached by people due to their lies. However, in some cases, some people get depression after hearing the truth. Thus, there is a controversial issue on whether people should always keep telling the truth, regardless of any relationships. Certainly, some people if asked would agree that sometimes do need lies. However, maintaining honesty in any conversation is the most crucial part of any relationship. Despite taradiddles, they can become a habit and break some relationships, and falsehood causes mental issues.
Firstly, lies are stressful for both speaker and listener. When a speaker says deliberate fictional statements, he/she has to conceive how to tell the next story. Also, the speaker should be nervous always about whether the listeners get to know his/her voices were novels during interaction with them. These factors give rise to the speaker being stressed. Even get in the heart the hearers from the betrayal when they realize the truth. According to a study done by H psychological laboratory, brains tend to become disabled to produce the hormone causing happiness after saying lies. Also, at the moment, the blood vessel will widen, meaning that people are nervous. Moreover, another study shows that if a person gets to know something is a lie, their depression quotient is increasing. Therefore, lies bring serious outcomes concerning the mind.
The more important reason is that, despite tiny lies, they result in cut ties from others. People tend to misunderstand when something has been not detected even if it is illegal or leads to severe consequences, it does not matter. Therefore, from the propensity, people are subject to misjudge what lies do not problematic. On top of that, people can easily habituate it. However, this bad habit can bring about damage in relationships since the more speaking lies, other people can find more easily contradictions. According to a study done by CU institute of psychology, notwithstanding the magnitude of an intentionally misleading statement from any networks of people, it causes a decrease in the number of conversations. One of the subjects in the study said that even though if it is a trivial fib if my friend is found out, the relationship becomes poor, and his/her trust in that person gets worse, and finally, we tend to avoid conversations. Therefore, the string between people will cut off due to the lies.
In conclusion, no matter what, people have to do keep their integrity. This is because the planned false statement will influence negatively the mind of both sides. The teller has been continuing with having the jitters and the hearer will feel betrayed. Also, the aggravate speaking will finally play a role as a scissor for the link between people because the relationship will be incommodious and get rid of the trust.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd the hearer will feel betrayed. Also, the aggravate speaking will finally play a role as a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...te speaking will finally play a role as a scissor for the link between people because the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as to, in conclusion, in some cases, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2403.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16774193548 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90744734892 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1859147436 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.85842293907 415% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183027201942 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466662384242 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041269081752 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110536995795 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498876284261 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.