Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for the Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
There are many countries to study space, and the field is very costed to research, so, they currently started investing in it. Should they capitalize on it? Some people think that the administrative places should fund space research. However, it is not helpful for the governments to assist costly space travel or space exploration because they have too lack money to put money into the study, and researchers are already supported by the researchers’ companies.
First of all, governments do have insufficient money to invest on the space fields due to obligation to resolve more prominent problems. What this means is that the revenue of governments generally comes from the people’s taxes, so they should prioritize where to spend the money wisely. There are important issues such as health and education that need more government funding. The most important factor to operate the governments is people, so, in terms of health, when people get illness, which is a serious problem for society such as an epidemic, it will be fatal for the management of them. For example, many historians argue that one of the most impacted factor to cause a lot of past countries fall. Also, in the case of education, this is a source of technological advancement. Therefore, if people are not instructed, especially higher-schooling such as university or college, the administration would not exploit future technology. However, people have to pay a lot of money for attending, which means that it is necessary for the organizations to back them financially. This clearly shows that the government should not sponsor space prober due to the lack of money.
Second, governments are not responsible for assisting monetarily space fields, provided by many groups interested in them. This is because other places such as universities and private companies recognize that one of the most impacted future industry is the space area. To be specific, scientific research is already well offered capital by organizations, so, the governments don’t need to be an additional supporter especially if it has no practical use. For example, in my case, I am currently working as an engineer at a large corporation in Korea. My job is to come up with innovative ideas and create equipment for space exploration. Most of my ideas and sample engines for going to space more efficiently will never be used, but I continue to research because I’m getting paid for it by the company which is a space company. Once they decide on equipment and start using the items when they fire their rocket to space. Hence, there is absolutely no need for extra funding from the government for my research.
In conclusion, what governments support space travel or exploration is a waste of money. they have to focus on other important things such as health and education because they are the most crucial factors in countries. Scientists already have gotten funding from companies since companies and universities foresee the future industry such as space travel.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to lack'?
Suggestion: to lack
... or space exploration because they have too lack money to put money into the study, and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'lacked'.
Suggestion: lacked
...space exploration because they have too lack money to put money into the study, and ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...vel or exploration is a waste of money. they have to focus on other important things...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2534.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11919191919 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93145444459 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 801.9 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.855551521 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.583333333 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273435645219 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089450153262 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856624708852 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190591715968 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025237808558 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.