In this day and age, an increasing number of contemporaries are paying attention to whether it is more entertaining for people to watch a live performance or to take part in the same event on television. Personally, I agree with the idea that it brings more excitement for people to join in a these events than watching a broadcasted version on TV.
On the one hand, there are some explanations for why people prefer a live performance broadcasted on TV. The most popular reason is that people find it money-consuming and inconvenience in buying tickets or preparing for a traveling to execute their attendance. Others might find it difficult to join in a live performance if they are afraid of suffocating environment or the risk of injury when being in crowded places. Moreover, those who watch a live performance are likely to see more parts of a show more clearly thanks to the advance of the television and the movements of cameramen.
On the other hand, people who think watching events on TV is more enjoyable might ignore a sense of participation and interaction given by attending a live performance. It is a fact that the atmosphere in the stadium evokes excitement and amusement that attendees could not experience if watching at home. For example, going to a football match is not only watching players and goals but also being a part of the cheering crowd to warm the environment. Secondly, it is a chance to interact with the performers and show appreciation. People could handshake or ask for signatures from their favorite idols.
From these above mentioned reasons, the conclusion can be drawn that watching events on TV and directly participating in a live performance have its own perks. Some people might find themselves liking this watching a broadcasted event, but I am delighted to attend events in a live show.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91025641026 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05865302329 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522435897436 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6186242089 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.846153846 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302932210241 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108373061553 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766999961829 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198256309522 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443467109486 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.