Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because people are too busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.
While some people believe that by being multiple task person, someone can prosper in doing his tasks, others claim that it is not convincing. To my way of thinking, doing limited tasks causes one performs them better than doing lots of tasks together because not only cannot one concentrate on his tasks, but also he does not have enough time to do all of them.
The first reason which should be stated here is that by performing several tasks simultaneously, one loses his focus on doing them. In my opinion, when someone has a lot of tasks for executing, he cannot allocate all his potential and concentration on doing them. In another word, when he is doing one task, at the same time he worries about other tasks, so he cannot think with a clear and open mind. For example, when I was studying my bachelor degree, I decided to finish my degree sooner than typical terms. Since, in one term I had a lot of courses, and most of them were irrelevant. I should prepare my physics, geometrics, mathematics, and history of country assignments for one specified date. All of them were difficult and irrelevant to each other. When I was studying physics, I remembered that I have a problem with mathematics, so I felt anxious and I lost my concentration. As a result, I failed some of my lessons, so I forced to pass them again. This process caused I graduate later than what I had desired. So, it is clear, doing a vast variety of tasks together reduces the efficiency.
Another point worth discussing here is that someone who wants to do a lot of tasks, actually he does not have enough time to do all of them, so he should choose which of them have more priority to other. As some people claim that who does different tasks at the same time have more possibility of succeeding, I think it is not possible all the time. For example, consider one architecture who wants to perform two projects at the same time. And the deadline for finishing both of them are close to each other. The problem that he faces is that both of them need a lot of time for executing. At a worse case, it is probable that he has a problem about attending in both of them, actually he should exist at the same time in those projects, and the location of them are not close to each other, so actually doing them at the same time is not possible. In the end, he forces to choose one of them to execute. Since, he looks which of them pays more money or provides a better condition for example, in his resume, to do it. Actually, doing different tasks at the same time is not possible or at least does not make a better future.
To summarize, as I mentioned, there are lots of reasons like, losing concentration and do not have enough time which shows by doing some tasks in the same time, one can distract from his purposes, and he cannot execute his tasks properly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 873, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'choosing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: choosing
... is not possible. In the end, he forces to choose one of them to execute. Since, he looks...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, look, so, while, at least, for example, i think, of course, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 522.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45593869732 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51656481283 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.411877394636 0.524837075471 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 740.7 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8858173826 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.130434783 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6956521739 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13043478261 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152990924737 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555396206821 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535394759249 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125021785941 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341435856967 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.