Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because the world is changing so quickly, people now less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
As far as I am concerned, I adopt a firm position that people nowadays are less happy than the people from the past. There are a lot of reasons for this opinion, but I would explore only a few primary ones here.
Beginning with the fact that we need modesty in every aspect of life to make ourselves happy. But nowadays as the world is becoming a global village. First of All, it's important to consider that nowadays, technology is so vast that we can easily observe everything by sitting at any place in the world. We are just a single click away from USA, UK or Germany. So, when people who are living in the third world countries saw those luxuries which people have in the privileged countries they became depressed and ultimately less happy and satisfied with their life. Earlier, people are living so much simple life that they are not brand conscious as our new generation is, they don’t have such lavish demands. To consider this idea lets consider the following example, When I was in my 4th grade back home in my country my father who worked in the Armed forces he was posted to the USA at that time, so he brings an Alarm clock for my Grand father which has light and it tells the time after every hour. My grandfather was so happy and in fact, he told that to everyone who visited our home. But, younger generation did not consider clock as a gift nowadays. Similarly, I can recollect it as a phrase that and wants to tell the story of my teen cousin who’s father gifted him iPhone 6s and he was not happy because he thinks that it is one of the old version and wants a brand new and in fact, he returned that back to his Dad that I don’t need it. Therefore I can safely presume that my mom was right because she always says that we make our life difficult by our own hands.
There is another reason yesterday I was watching a documentary on create television in which they are comparing the lives of the 19th century and 21st century. Everything was so simple, no cars, no gadgets, and food was also so healthy that people live for more than 100 yrs, But now everything is so adulterated because of the greedy nature of people as they want to earn more and become rich. Although, they have ample amount still they are not satisfied with their having.
By the way of the conclusion, I can easily say that people nowadays are less happy than our ancestors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1462, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...k to his Dad that I don't need it. Therefore I can safely presume that my mom was ri...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...they want to earn more and become rich. Although, they have ample amount still they are ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, similarly, so, still, therefore, third, in fact, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41950113379 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33845674422 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6576500158 48.9658058833 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.647058824 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9411764706 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228511506631 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760983032218 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779707288877 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164234550806 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018609764781 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.