Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the modern area, people really need some times that they can reduce stress and make fresh. Hence, travel industry is flourishing. Whether people prefer use tour for go to travel or go with themselves is controversial. According what I generally believe, most people tend to utilize tour for trip; therefore, I agree with this proposal. The following paragraphs by containing the main reasons, will substantiate my viewpoint.
The main reasons why I believe traveler want to use tour is aspect of economical. To elaborate on my point, since people who want go to trip do not use their own cars, tour travels are really economical. On the other words, traveler do not need pay money for some things such as petroleum, static of cars and many other similar items and containers so that they can save their money. In many trip tour, people pay amount of certain money for many thing like buses, hotels and mail of food which this money is lower than the price of gas and oil. A significant example that strikes my mind is about my own experience. Last years, me and one of my friend decided go to Esfahan for travel. We went to trip by special tour that we payed only 30000 Tomas for 4 days. We went to special hotels with excellent food. This trip was so economical for my and my friend.
In addition, I think that tour leaders have high information about places which have special view and sightseen. Inasmuch as tour leaders is jobs that must know about many place, they have better information about cities which people want to see. Traveler see the special place so that they are really enjoy their trip. A quite clear example would be my own trip. Last month, I went to north of Iran with special tour and our tour leaders had acknowledge about jungles. Thus, owing to having information, tour leaders went use to special environmental. If I go to this jungle with my self, I would not find this place.
To conclude, I generally believe that many humans really prefer go to travel with tour leaders. tour leaders not only have good information about environmental but also this tripe has very economical for people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to pay'?
Suggestion: to pay
...n the other words, traveler do not need pay money for some things such as petroleum...
^^^
Line 6, column 169, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun place seems to be countable; consider using: 'many places'.
Suggestion: many places
...ur leaders is jobs that must know about many place, they have better information about cit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 258, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'sees'.
Suggestion: sees
...ties which people want to see. Traveler see the special place so that they are real...
^^^
Line 6, column 304, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enjoyed'.
Suggestion: enjoyed
...e special place so that they are really enjoy their trip. A quite clear example would...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 445, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'acknowledged'.
Suggestion: acknowledged
...h special tour and our tour leaders had acknowledge about jungles. Thus, owing to having in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 445, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'acknowledged'.
Suggestion: acknowledged
...h special tour and our tour leaders had acknowledge about jungles. Thus, owing to having in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Tour
... prefer go to travel with tour leaders. tour leaders not only have good information ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, really, so, therefore, thus, as for, as to, i think, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70588235294 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47422585643 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510695187166 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2480810991 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5217391304 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2608695652 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13043478261 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155044781388 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553124228414 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415659082769 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107342801836 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018992331061 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.