TPO 21
The lecture and the reading discuss genetically modified trees that trees change an organism's genes. Although the passage claims that genetically modified trees bring about several advantageous points, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the passage points out that the genetically modified trees would better survive in harsh condition. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that the genetically modified trees may be resistant in particular situation, it does not mean that they may better survive. She explains that some native trees can survive in different condition like different weather, water resource etc, and they can survive. Conversely, the genetically modified trees are uniform; hence, with changing in condition, all the trees would die.
Furthermore, although the reading passage says that the genetically modified trees have economic benefits for farmers, the professor argues that genetically modified trees have hidden cost. It means that farmers do not have alow to use their seeds after first cultivated. According to the low, they must pay money to the companies for each cultivates trees.
Finally, although the reading passage says that people would use genetically modified trees for producing wood, and it helps to prevent overexploitation of wild trees. The speaker disagrees by mentioning that genetically modified trees cause many damages to local trees. Because genetically modifies trees grow aggressively and they ability more resistant that the local trees. So, they outcompete the local trees for natural sources such as sunlight, soil and water.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organisms'' or 'organism's'?
Suggestion: organisms'; organism's
...lly modified trees that trees change an organisms genes. Although the passage claims that...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, in contrast, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68774703557 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67934632283 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549407114625 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.964556797 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.692307692 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.536948091888 0.272083759551 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225031317955 0.0996497079465 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104112582783 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353388349693 0.162205337803 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055898153633 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.2367328918 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.