Nowadays, some may hold the opinion that the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. But others have a negative attitude. As far as I am concerned, I agree that traveling by a tour guide can be a better option for me. My arguments for this point are listed as follows.
I agree with the statement that the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide without reservations since you can get more idea and information about what is the importance related to place or object. When I went to travel Czechia by a guided tour, I did not spend the time to research what is the significance of the historical places where I visited. Instead of learning on my own, I spent time looking for the tremendous ornament of the palace. I was really struck with admiration.
Another reason why I agree with the above statement is that I believe that traveling with a tour makes the journey much more attractive and enjoyable. I can hang with the other tourists who are from different cities. As I travel, I will learn not only places or things but also I learn people.
In a word, a tour guide is the best way for traveling. Taking into account all these factors, we may reach the conclusion that a tour guide must be preferred when traveling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
... only places or things but also I learn people. In a word, a tour guide is the be...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, really, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 1977.66487455 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 235.0 407.700716846 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.36170212766 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54453852872 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 212.727598566 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548936170213 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 618.680645161 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5003436722 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8461538462 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76923076923 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290574071065 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960914877504 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100909788442 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170406749264 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491319344115 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 11.7677419355 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.71 10.9000537634 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 86.8835125448 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.