Some people believe that children should begin learning a foreign language as soon as they start school. However, in my opinion, I do not agree to this and I think children do not need to start to learn a foreign language in an early age.
To begin with, children should learn their mother language first in depth in school. Learning two languages at the same time in kindergarten or elementary school can cause confusion to children and interfere improving the mother language. For example, one of my friends sent his son to Chinese kindergarten to learn Chinese intensively. Few years later, the son could have a better Chinese proficiency than before, but his Korean ability had only little improvement and caused a problem in making friends in Korean school. So, I think that children should learn a foreign language after mastering his mother language first.
On top of that, Children can lose interest on the foreign language easily in case of studying it at an early age. For instance, most Korean children in China start to learn Chinese from kindergarten to high school, but their Chinese ability is still not so satisfactory. Since they have had lots of stress and pressure on Chinese, they cannot enjoy studying Chinese anymore. However, many students who are from Korea in high school or University have good Chinese level within short time, because Chinese is totally new to them, so they can enjoy and want to study Chinese hard by their will.
To sum up, Children should not learn a foreign language before mastering their mother language first in depth after entering school. Also If children start to learn a foreign language too early, they can lose interest on the foreign language easily. In this regard, I do not support the idea that Children should begin learning a foreign language as soon as they start school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rn a foreign language in an early age. To begin with, children should learn the...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r mastering his mother language first. On top of that, Children can lose intere...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t to study Chinese hard by their will. To sum up, Children should not learn a f...
^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e first in depth after entering school. Also If children start to learn a foreign la...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...language as soon as they start school.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, for example, for instance, i think, in short, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93269230769 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46782175831 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467948717949 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6800550242 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 5.45110844103 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359676810225 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177539309934 0.076458572812 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137051498008 0.0737576698707 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282672013803 0.150856017488 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134060065693 0.0645574589148 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 86.8835125448 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.