No one can deny that some people would agree that today's children would be happy if they had less stuff, such as toys, PlayStations, and so on, while others oppose this claim.
In my point of view, I would agree with the above-mentioned statement.
I feel this way for several causes, which I will explore in greater detail in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, many studies have shown that kids who are content with their things feel happier and more confident than their peers who have more possessions and may sense jealousy and resentment.
That is due to a good education which plays a vital role in children's lives.
In others words, parents should inculcate human values such as contentment in their children.
As a result, if these principles are instilled in a child's mind at an early age, the child will eventually recognize that pleasure is not determined by the number of items he possesses, but rather by contentment with what he has.
For example, we may see that the happiness of children in camps, refugees, or children who have survived wars is vastly different from that of other children.
For example, those kids may be content simply because they have a pen or a coloring book in their hands, and they are less concerned with the quantity of what they have than with what they have right now.
To continue, the abundance of possessions, in my opinion, distracts children's attention away from what is most important, especially in the early stages of life.
Because children can gain useful skills such as playing, singing, dancing, and learning new languages at these stages.
For example, if children have a lot of toys, they may remain busy playing with those toys the whole day rather than spending time learning new things or playing with friends in the field.
From what I have deliberated, I reckon that a child's happiness differs from one child to another based on their environment.
Also, I would agree that the more possessions the less focus on valuable activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 14, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the less focus on valuable activities.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, while, as to, for example, i feel, i reckon, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89212827988 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60224293014 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542274052478 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4997979386 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 4.53405017921 309% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207838709793 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762034723644 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064583265583 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762034723644 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064583265583 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.