Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. Face-to-face communication is better than other type of communication such as letters, or telephone.
There are two types of attitude about having communication. Some people prefer to have direct communication. Others, however, prefer to have other kind of communication such as texting, writing letter, etc. As I concerned, I prefer second attitude. This essay will support this idea by providing some reasons in following paragraphs.
To begin with, face to face communication helps people to understand each other more easily. Since, in this type of communication we can use face expression, which means use our face’s gesture to transfer our meaning to other side. In addition, we can use tone in expressing our feeling like by increasing our voice, use pause, or use sad voice to show our depression. According to the recent research which was done by Michigan phycology institution (MPI), lecturer, who use body language and control their voice in correct and exact way have more impress on audience that who just stand firm and talk in static voice. Their results show that we express our feels sixty percent by our body language and 25 percent by our voice. Therefore, our text has minority effect on our lecturing.
Furthermore, face to face communication make our communication more interesting and attractive. When we talk with others we see their face and hear their voice. So that, we enjoy their face beauty and their voice’s charming. For instance, I had a professor who tough Portfolio optimization 101 in our university. She was so nice and fabulously beautiful. But her knowledge about his major was not as good as her beauty. Whereas, she was so popular specifically between guys and they try to take this course with her.
To sum up, from what I discuss above, we can safely drew the conclusion that communication which is generated by face to face has better result than other kind of communication. I showed this by presenting some reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a tough'.
Suggestion: who is a tough
...arming. For instance, I had a professor who tough Portfolio optimization 101 in our unive...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 53, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'draw'
Suggestion: draw
...rom what I discuss above, we can safely drew the conclusion that communication which...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02572347267 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90580968123 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585209003215 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3429240311 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.15 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.55 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232047012005 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740773444483 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103756844238 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152808120975 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485384584615 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.