Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we ate in the past was healthier than the food we eat today.

It is obvious that food plays a vital role in human beings’ health. There is different factors decide whether food is healthy or not. I strongly believe that food which humans consumed in the past was healthier than food that individuals eat today. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss my view using some reasons and examples.

I think in today’s sophisticated world, because of the development of technology and industry, it is difficult to have access to healthy food compared with the past. The factors such as air, soil, water pollution cause harmful damage to agricultural products. Farmers use chemical fertilizers to gain more profit which is harmless for our health. Also, most of fruits and vegetables are planted in greenhouses and animal are raised in factories under bad conditions. As a result, humans have not access to healthy vegetables and meats, whereas in the past, people were able to take organic food which was useful their health. For example, my father suffers from stomach disease, and his doctor recommended that he should organic food. Thus, he has to spend a lot of money to buy healthier food.

Moreover, in addition to difficulty to access to healthy food, nowadays people are busier than the past. Industrialization has led them to dedicate most of their time to their job. Therefore, they do not assign enough time to buy food materials and cook their meals at home. They prefer to eat their food at restaurants or prepare fast foods at home very quickly. It is evident that these foods are unhealthy and result in various diseases such as obesity, stomach and health irritation, etc. for instance, my friend is a student in a well-known university, and she is forced to study very hard in order to get satisfactory results. Consequently, she rarely prepares her food at home and eats their meals at restaurant near the university.

To sum up, today, accessibility to healthy food resources is hard for humans owing to environmental pollution and the use of chemical fertilizers. Furthermore, individuals do not allot much time to make food ready.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are different factors'?
Suggestion: There are different factors
...ital role in human beings' health. There is different factors decide whether food is healthy or not. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the fruits') or simply say ''most fruits''.
Suggestion: most of the fruits; most fruits
...which is harmless for our health. Also, most of fruits and vegetables are planted in greenhous...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not allot much time to make food ready.
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04011461318 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85965914574 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573065902579 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9695011261 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.95 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.45 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.95 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278621719874 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884907536523 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825230749631 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185321017315 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582583861383 0.0645574589148 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.