Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some experts say that the government should spend money to support the arts. this is because it creates much income through galleries. However, I strongly disagree with these people and believe that spending money on athletics is much more advantageous for the government. I support my viewpoint with two reasons.
First of all, spending more money will inturn creates surplus money for the government. For instance, who doesn't like sports, everyone willing to see the major sports event by watching them in stadiums rather than watching them on the television at home. In the past, as stadiums were not available the government focused on arts to make money but now they are focusing on stadiums as they became popular to gain as much money they needed. It is important for the government to spend money on athletics so that it receives huge profits than they expected, such money can be used for the welfare of people who are in need.
Secondly, spending a great amount of money on athletics would bring fame to the particular state government if they win. For example, if the sports team of a particular state is provided with all the facilities they needed then they would reproduce in the same way. Additionally, the winning team can represent the state in national sports competition and would bring fame to the state which they never exposed of. Furthermore, it creates an identity for a particular sports team which can be remembered ever by many people.
Finally, spending more money on athletics can create more employment opportunities when comparing to other fields. In my way of illustration, in my state before the build of stadiums or the start of the Olympics, there were many people whose talent was underestimated. As soon as the Olympics event began, people were recruited in many positions such as the trainers, the controllers, the commentators, the doctors and many more. This clearly illustrates, how important for people to run their daily life.
In conclusion, the issue is whether the government should spend money on arts or athletics is complex. Some have suggested that the talent for arts is very important which is always underrated by the government. Nevertheless, I still contend that spending money on the Olympics is much more advantageous for the people and also for the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...should spend money to support the arts. this is because it creates much income throu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...y for the government. For instance, who doesnt like sports, everyone willing to see th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...orts, everyone willing to see the major sports event by watching them in stadiums rath...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07512953368 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7733919905 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476683937824 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0831545637 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.105263158 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3157894737 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57894736842 5.45110844103 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253858921101 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908360331518 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711861650187 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1533126557 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649933946401 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.