Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is highly debatable that whether government should spend more money to support the arts than to support athletics, and this topic can be approached from several angle due to its complexity. However, deeply deliberate over this topic, I content that a good government should balance its financial support of the arts and athletics and the following discussion reveals my reasoning.
On one hand, it is truly important that governments overwrite artists and assist the development of arts. Arts broaden human's horizons, clear our mind and benefit people's spiritual health. Take my friend, Amy, for example. Amy was ones a shy, diffident girl who had never spoken on the stage without shaking. Nevertheless, after she entered the university’s art department, the knowledge and beauty of arts enlighten her mind and bring rich ideas to her. She becomes confident and always offer intellectual insight.
On the other hand, exercising is a crucial, but taxing, way to enhance physical health. Few people could exercise spontaneously without stimulation. Thus, governments should support and emphasize athletics to promote its citizen’s fitness. For instance, bolstering state-sponsored Olympic teams is a good approach to awaken the importance of athletics for the Olympic game is the apex in the sport world. These athletes exemplify the ideal and people will follow them to exercise.
Accordingly, in order to strengthen its citizens and become a great country, a government should aid equally the arts and athletics in that only people with both mental and physical health is truly strong. To be specific, without arts, human who excel at athletics could be physical healthy but mental weak; without athletics, a country may be rife with citizens whose life span is short.
In sum, with the reasons I mention above, firstly, arts benefit people's mental health, secondly, athletics enhance physical health, and a great country consist of people with wellness, I believe that governments should wholeheartedly and equivalently support arts and athletics.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45171339564 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8779719268 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588785046729 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9011748283 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8125 5.45110844103 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274329693485 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784139084131 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865402113626 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156960641541 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899041554588 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.