Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I would say arts and athletics are equally important to the human being, in that arts cultivate our minds with a more sensitive perception of the world around us, while athletics train our body to lead a healthy life. However, when putting them together under the consideration of government funding, I would agree with the statement and support that the government should spend more budget on the arts for the following reasons.
To begin with, arts are diverse and this diversity makes it difficult to get sustainable funding before a type of art truly matures. In contrast, athletics already develop into certain types that are known to the world, and this clarity makes athletics easier to gain sponsorship than arts. For example, lots of famous sports brands, such as Nike and Addidas, spend loads of money on both national and international athletic competitions. Therefore, considering these dissimilar levels of attracting fundings from different sources, I would state that arts need government funding more urgently than athletics since other sources of funding are challenging to access when the art is still under the early development stage.
Furthermore, art can develop on a relatively small scale, which means small funding can already sustain several art activities. Nonetheless, athletics are usually a group activity that requires a higher amount of sponsorship. As a result, when the government budget is limited, the same amount of funding can support more art activities than the athletic groups. Therefore, when the benefit is being calculated, I would say that putting resources in arts can produce more benefit in that they require fewer unit resources compared to athletic actitivies.
Last, art is accessible to everyone, while athletic is more suitable for people with certain physical quality. Based on these differences, the promotion of art can generally benefit a wider group of citizens. Again, when the government wants to maximize its investment defined by the ultimate amount of people are being supported, the easy access to art will make it more possible for the funding to be used by the majority of the citizens since people are supported to visit museums or libraries. But if the funding is put to athletics, people who are not interested in the sport will be excluded from the funding. That's the reason why the funding put to arts will create more final synergy than to athletics.
In conclusion, I agree with the statement that government should primarily support arts, in that arts are difficult to acquire funding in the early development stage, and arts require a relatively small budget to get survived. Finally, arts can benefit more people than athletics in their nature of easy access.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ources compared to athletic actitivies. Last, art is accessible to everyone, whi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 617, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...port will be excluded from the funding. Thats the reason why the funding put to arts ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20316027088 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73330715525 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489841986456 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 724.5 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.2323118312 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.588235294 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0588235294 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.29411764706 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282047728624 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101435262358 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747510627561 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186816845163 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546782218242 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.