Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Most people would agree that the governments should both spend money on the arts and athletics. Personally, I feel this way that the governments should pay more for the latter than the former which I will explore more in the following essay.
First, the possible revenue could be huge when the governments funding international sports competitions like the Olympic games. Take 2021 Olympic games for example. Though the pandemic hit Japan seriously, and the public questioned the government, still the government decided to hold the Olympic games for the broadcast authorization fee and other possible revenue. The are many attracting factors for the governments to hold sports competitions and the revenue can be used to build infrastructures and the well-being belongs to the public.
Moreover, the athletes' daily expenditure is usually too high to afford without companies or the government's help. For instance, professional medical care and athletic trainers are crucial for full-time sports players. Without funding, the potential talented athletes could be destroyed by reality and daily needs. There are many stories about the famous sports players that how financial problems obstructed them when they were not famous yet. Since we only know the already famous sports players' stories, there must have more athletes have financial problems and were forced to stop their dreams. The governments should spend more money to the help young, not famous athletes to develop their career.
Furthermore, the career life span of the athletes are usually shorter than the artists and most jobs. As young as thirty, however, is the proper time for badminton, basketball, baseball players to retire. Those sports players spend their time on the sport field and may not have other competitive skills to fit in the society after retirement. It is the governments' responsibility to take care of those athletes who play sports games in the name of their countries.
In conclusion, since the uniqueness of the athletes' professional needs and the various way to earn huge money through holding international athletic competitions, the governments should put more money on the athletics than the arts.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ional medical support while the artists dont. In Olympic Games, we can see many doct...
^^^^
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...idy for the retirement sport players or help them to find jobs for their retirement. For the arti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in summary, in most cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 43.0788530466 21% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 52.1666666667 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14102564103 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5295021248 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8797950062 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4210526316 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4210526316 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181844876108 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673233388442 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717222087539 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126653599295 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756270926315 0.0645574589148 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.