Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

There is no shadow of a doubt that sports and being physically active play a pivotal role in our lives. Some may hold a view that governments do not support arts like they support athletics, like Olympics teams, but others have a negative attitude toward it. Personally, I believe that governments should spend more money and support sports teams than they spend in art. I feel this way for several reasons which I will explore in the following essay. First of all, in this sedentary life, being physically active is more important than in the past. With the advancement of technology, our physical activity is less a few decades ago. Obviously, governments should plan policies and decisions about this matter because it could affect people's health so easy. One of the policies could be supporting the Olympics and the athletes. If the government advocates them, they will succeed at the national level and they will be an inspiration for all people watching them. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in elementary school, our national Volleyball team won the Olympics and received a gold medal. The team and their success motivated and inspired me so much that I got into the field of sport and practiced volleyball with my friend every day after school. Eventually, we grew up and not only we have healthy bodies, but also we have a healthy mind. As you can see, Sports can inspire people to be more healthy and happy. Secondly, if athletes being supported emotionally and financially, they can achieve a lot at the national level. Therefore, this could build a lot of good reputation for a country and not only the people will advantage from it, but also the government will benefit from it and make a lot of profit. For instance, China has very professional gymnasts. Over the past years, the Chinees government spends a lot of money to embrace gymnastic all over the country. As a result, Chinese gymnasts have won gold medals in every single Olympics. This success made other countries to hire mentors from china to teach their athletes gymnastic. Additionally, the government built museums about the history of this marvelous success and thousands of people from all over the world come to China just to visit these museums. This experience taught me that investing in sport can cause economic development. In conclusion, I am of the opinion that the government should invest more in Olympic teams and athletic sport than in the arts. This is because in this way people will have healthy lives and also it will cause economic development.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'holds'.
Suggestion: holds
...y a pivotal role in our lives. Some may hold a view that governments do not support ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2139.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87243735763 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6387926469 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519362186788 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9260130689 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.125 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2916666667 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20224274422 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602423403778 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810282330324 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20224274422 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.