Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If you do not make sure other people (especially influential people or your employers) know about your strengths and accomplishments, you will never get success in life.
Throughout history, finding success keys had been one of the prominent milestones of recent decades in psychological topics. Also, this issue has engendered many heated controversies among academicians. Some people may hold the view that environmental factors, such as other people encouragement, are leading circumstances. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that ones' personality is a more dominant aspect. I contend that the former is more acceptable. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will pinpoint my most outstanding reasons.
First of all, the potential for victory is hidden in your heart and belief. Power is internal, and when you move, other people can only see your results, your achievements. And they have no idea about your efforts. So until you get to some practical things, people won't encourage you and sometimes even help you. We can therefore conclude that their dominant judgment cannot be fair enough.
Another equally significant point supporting this opinion is that from a theoretical standpoint, mankind beholds the world based on his conviction. Hence, his bias against your passion may cause you to treat you in a way that weakens you; and by following this negative energy, if you choose to give in there would be no achievement to be acclaimed. That’s while someone’s dream may be in contradiction with others, and this may lead to discouraging people who are running for goals in the opposite direction.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first things that leave the mind at first glance, they are by no means the only reason. There is another subtlety that you need to keep in mind. Even if others are aware of your abilities and previous exploits, other factors may be more important in realizing your dreams and achieving success. For instance, I can mention the status of academic, financial, and social status; Which has many effects on determining people's goals and attitudes towards you. Many of them are changeable and can be corrected with some effort. For example, if a student convinces the university's finance department to consider some monetary resources for his project. His coach may be more optimistic about the success of his proposal.
To put in briefly, all the enumerated reasons converge to the point that in the path of becoming prosperous, one should aim for improving his endeavor and mindset than others notion. Actually, to construct success castle, one should take into account the fact that when he credits a goal by his heart, no barrier can hinder him, and in the end, there are always some people to praise him and relate stories about his success.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, briefly, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in brief, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2224.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12442396313 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80369208954 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2269497245 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6956521739 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8695652174 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95652173913 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264124682698 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716661357141 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799441037466 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154077166326 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862303134371 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.