Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Two people can still become good friends if one of them has more money than the other one does.
The question is whether two persons would remain as friends even if one of them has much more money compared with the other one or not. Everyone with regard to his private viewpoint can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however, in my opinion, there are many factors involved in continuing a friendship between two people, and money is not the only factor. I feel this way for some reason, which I will explore them to empower my vantage point in the following essay.
First of all, true friendship is based on mutual respect and value, so people with different levels of wealth can be best friends. Clearly, people can attract others if they can have a veil of time with each other, and it happens that people have something in common to enjoy their time helping to strengthen their emotional bond. In this line of thinking, money has nothing to do with this procedure, so people with different amounts of capital can be perfect pals. I explain my own experience with an example. One of the best friends I spend most of my time with is Sahar. His father is a carpet merchant, while I come from a middle-income family. Our friendship dates back to 10 years ago when we were both first-year college students. We were in the same group in the physics lab. I was the first student in the class, and yet Sahar, despite having a private tutor, still had difficulty understanding physics and always regretted her father. One day I suggested to her that if she wanted to, we could work physics after class, and that's how our friendship was established, and now we're both mechanical engineering students, and Sahar provides financial support for the projects we carry out. And this friendship is still there, despite our great financial disputes.
Another noteworthy point that confirms this view is that when people trust each other, they can achieve complete harmony that can be created between different types of people, regardless of their wealth. To be more specific, there is no friendship or love before trust. There must be an empathetic between one human being and another human being so that they can live together comfortably and with confidence. The survival of friendships, family relationships, and ordinary life in society depends on the preservation of the knot that is the most basic element of human socialization and is called "trust." When there is empathy and unity between the two sides, there will never be jealousy or insecurity, and friendships will continue for many years, regardless of each other's assets. For example, if you really consider your friend as your friend, you will be happy with his success and you will never be jealous. Always treat others the way you would like to be treated. This slogan is a healthy relationship.
In the final analysis, by taking all of these into account, people with different economic levels can continue their friendship because not only money is not the only criterion for determining the friendship between two people, but also other factors such as trust and respect and mutual value pave the way for friendship stability between different people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1035, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... we could work physics after class, and thats how our friendship was established, and...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, so, still, then, while, for example, i feel, such as, first of all, in my opinion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2613.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 531.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9209039548 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65734990291 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514124293785 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 791.1 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.5205823928 48.9658058833 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.772727273 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1363636364 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267246852824 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766836474967 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745739484762 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16972445772 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681046418334 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.