Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without a shadow of the doubt, universities have a play role in social development and improvement. Universities are one of the backbones of society and their condition can effect all the people who live in a country. Many people contend that to improve the quality of education spending more money on salaries for university professors is essential, while others rejects this. Both of the opposing arguments appear to be somewhat convincing and stand to point. However, my personal experience and actual observation of life have led me to be agree that spending more money on salaries for professors is a good idea. In the ensuing lines, I delve into many reasons to substantiate my point.
The first and possibly the paramount consequential reason is that by having more salaries prodessors can concentrate just on their experiments and researchers. So, they do not need to look for other jobs to do for earning more money. If a country pay more money as salaries to the professors, this country will be finally progress. Believe it or not money is a key to everything. So, for doing more experiments in country we need well-paid professors. Their investigations and findings can be very influential. So, I believe paying more money is a good idea.
Another point springing to mind is about having skilled skilled and active students in country. If professors in every society just focus on education, they will breed active and adept students. Students are life-blood for a country. Finally, these students have to work in country and for dealing with difficulties and challenges they must be smart. This is a complex issue and based on researchers' opinion there is a corrolation between the professors' salaries and smartness of students. Recently, scienticts by doing a lot of studies that conducted on 1000 professors and their students with different countries to avoid any biad demonstrated that in countries that the professors recieve less money students are nonchalent and lazy, in contrast, professors who recieve good salaries have adept students. As you can see, payin more money to professors is beneficial.
To sum it all up, by taking all the details into concideration, spending more money on salaries for professors has advantages like having skilled students and having advances country. I hope someday we can improve our society and If it is possible by paying more to professors we can do it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: skilled
...point springing to mind is about having skilled skilled and active students in country. If prof...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'researchers'' or 'researcher's'?
Suggestion: researchers'; researcher's
...t. This is a complex issue and based on researchers opinion there is a corrolation between ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, so, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07286432161 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95513812577 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477386934673 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1631562661 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7727272727 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.86363636364 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169175422671 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529513307334 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042194607293 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110115686752 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044141790436 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.