Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Ever since the dawn of civilization, people have craved to improve the quality of education to uplift their societies. Whereas some people believe that raising professors' salaries is not an effective way to advance education, others disagree. Indeed, I undoubtedly reckon that offering high income to educators would serve the objective of education's advancement for two compelling reasons.
First and foremost, establishing satisfying salaries for professors encourages them to devote their time and efforts entirely to their students and be willing to share their valuable knowledge, which would certainly reflect on the quality of education they provide. On the other hand, low-paid professors spend their precious time teaching in various universities to compensate for their low income. For example, Currently, my husband works in a private university and earns sufficient money; he dedicates himself totally to his students to benefit them and improve their academic attainment. On the contrary, a few years ago, he was a professor at Cairo University in Egypt with a low salary. So, the relentless financial pressure did force him to have a tremendous teaching load that exceeded his ability, which undermined his focus, ingenuity and declined his performance. Had Cairo university offered him a reasonable salary, he would have contributed to education quality.
Second, raising professors' salaries would attract the most talented scientists and researchers with a high level of expertise and proficiency to teach in universities, which will boost the quality of education. For instance, all Ph.D. holders will compete and work with diligence meticulously in their research to have a university position because of the high salary combined with prestige. Competition among scholars to be university professors would enrich the entire academia with researchers and high-caliber professors. High pay guarantees a continual supply of the most brilliant professors to universities, which permits universities to hire the best professors. As you can see, raising professors' salaries inspires genius people to be professors.
In conclusion, I believe that improving educators' income does contribute to the quality of education. Not only because professors dedicate themselves entirely to their students and universities, but also it would attract the most talented people to take teaching in universities as their career objective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dvancement for two compelling reasons. First and foremost, establishing satisfy...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have contributed to education quality. Second, raising professors salaries woul...
^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iversities to hire the best professors. As you can see, raising professors salar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73002754821 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07243438925 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548209366391 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2693856782 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250676613265 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921557301453 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321618152233 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152582189181 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335895419722 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 58.1214874552 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 10.9000537634 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.