TPO 29: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The quality of education is crucial because it determines the future of the current and coming generation. University professors are among numerous elements that contribute to the advancements of education. To what extent universities should spend on professors' salaries to promote educational quality has raised considerable controversy. I, undoubtedly, reckon that raising professors' income is most likely to uplift educational excellence for two reasons.
First, a satisfying income for professors guarantees that they devote themselves entirely to their students and academic research. In other words, when professors earn adequate money that commensurates with the precarious economic status nowadays, they will be able to focus on the level of education they provide. For instance, my husband is a professor at the American University of Egypt; he is secured and content with his salary. As a result, he works meticulously and diligently with his students to benefit from his precious knowledge. He is willing to dedicate all his time and effort to them. Therefore, his students get the highest quality possible academic attainment. Had his university paid him a low salary, the financial burden would have forced him to work in multiple universities with a tremendous workload; that distracts his attention away from students, meaning sacrificing the quality of education.
Another equally powerful reason that raising professors' salaries is an effective means of advancing educational quality is the higher likelihood of encouraging the most talented and genius students and scholars to be university professors. Nowadays, the numbers of Ph.D. holders who accept teaching positions are declining dramatically due to income-related issues. For example, my brother-in-law was a full professor at Alexandria University, yet he had a hardship covering his family expenses. Thus, it is no coincidence that my nephew and all his colleagues in the doctorate program who graduated with honor turned down all teaching offers in educational institutes because of the money issue. As you can see, students lose golden opportunities to benefit from professors with expertise and ingenuity, like my nephew and many others like him.
In conclusion, raising professors' salaries guarantees that professors work hard with their students and focus only on their students. Furthermore, It encourages young gifted scientists to have teaching positions as their career goals. For these two reasons and many more, I believe that universities should spend more on faculties teaching members to elevate the quality of education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...sy. I, undoubtedly, reckon that raising professors income is most likely to uplift educati...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ducational excellence for two reasons. First, a satisfying income for professor...
^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and academic research. In other words, when professors earn adequate money that...
^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... For these two reasons and many more, I believe that universities should spend m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67684478372 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10315123989 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552162849873 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.564215232 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.421052632 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6842105263 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255948739197 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824835140099 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661403360998 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1750709988 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415601703137 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.