Ambitious dreams are better than realistic goals. Agree or disagree?
Ambition is the gate of our future to live a flourishing life. Some people believe it is better to have realistic goals rather than dream ambitious. In my opinion, I reckon that it is critically important to have ambitious plans for our future. I feel that way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, ambitious dreams provoke hope in a better future, which make life worth living and meaningful. To be more specific, sometimes people encounter unfortunate circumstances that turn their lives upside down, but only an enormous goal is what keeps them enthusiastic and motivated to overcome obstacles and disappointments. Take Stephen Hawking, for example, that talented and genius graduate student who got a rare disease that made him unable to move once he embarked on his Ph.D. However, he had a sizable ambition to create the astonishing The Theory For Everything, regarding his field of cosmology. Although all obstructions that associated his illness, he accomplished his doctoral degree with honor and had tremendous valuable research productions that amazed humanity. As you can see, the outstanding dream kept him incredibly productive full of hope and motivation.
Secondly, people whose dreams are realistic may end up wondering what they might have lost by giving up their big dreams and settled down for less. To illustrate, some individuals get scared of fierce competition and prefer to stay in their comfort zone, where they do the bare minimum to achieve real progress in their careers. For example, my best friend and I worked in a real estate firm for a few years. We could hardly afford to pay the rent and other bills for a middle-class family, which was an immensely annoying issue for us. Therefore, I asked him to join me as a freelancer and leave that limited-salary job, but he chose to adhere to stability with a fixed-income instead. Currently, I have a well-known real estate firm, and I own a spacious house with a pool while he still an employee in the same organization with the same standard of living. Frankly, he had been regretting his giving up the dream that we always shared.
In conclusion, I believe that people should go after their fabulous dreams, and not to confine themselves to realistic goals. Not only because of splendid objectives that give hope to a better tomorrow and rescue people from disappointment but also they make people never regret their lagging behind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Ambition is the gate of our future to li...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will explore in the following essay. First and foremost, ambitious dreams pro...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le to move once he embarked on his Ph.D. However, he had a sizable ambition to cr...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ductive full of hope and motivation. Secondly, people whose dreams are realis...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng up the dream that we always shared. In conclusion, I believe that people sho...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, frankly, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, i feel, i reckon, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00731707317 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85799649439 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612195121951 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2644768751 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.055555556 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153146112226 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526039583481 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889648831866 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102870565747 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624830806051 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.