Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Ever since the dawn of civilization, people are craving to abreast the galloping news in our vigorous world. In my opinion, I believe it is critically important to hear news messages from people who have radically different points of view of ours rather than to adhere to news agencies who broadcast our pre-existing opinions. I feel that way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, watching media agencies that provide us with different opinions from ours broadens our horizons because we can see then the panoramic picture of any piece of information from various angles. Undoubtedly, hearing or reading different perspectives provokes our minds to search for the accuracy of our original beliefs and contemplate profoundly. Ultimately, we will build our opinions depending on logical reasoning, which reflects positively on our decisions. For example, a few years ago, I had faith in one of the candidates for the presidential election in my country Egypt and had decided to vote for him. I was flexible enough to embrace every opportunity to hear or read negative opinions about him, which made me anxious to search for trustworthy and neutral thoughts away from fanaticism. Despite that, he was my favorite candidate; I had gone with the rational decision by not voting for him after all.
Secondly, another remarkably potential benefit of obtaining news from those with an opposite view is the higher likelihood to make acquaintance with more people. As we all know, the way a person responds to someone whose opinion differs drastically from theirs reveals their real character. To be more specific, being tolerant of different voices about one thing indicates that a person is blessed (endowed) with the quality of inclusiveness and humility, which leaves good impressions on others. Consequently, no one, including those from the opposing party, will refuse to be friends with open-minded and modest ones. On the other hand, those who are solely accepting the same opinion are usually self-centric and fanatic. So, they do not consider others' thoughts or feelings but impose only their view. Thus, it is unlikely that they will ever build friendships with those of different ideas. Even worse, the already established friends may also end once any disagreement occurs.
In a nutshell, it is sensible for people to read or watch the news from people with dissenting perspectives, to widen their scope, and enlarge their social network.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Ever since the dawn of civilization, peo...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will explore in the following essay. First and foremost, watching media agenc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ision by not voting for him after all. Secondly, another remarkably potential b...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...also end once any disagreement occurs. In a nutshell, it is sensible for people...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, after all, for example, i feel, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19402985075 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82218068946 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609452736318 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.226549202 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213666996356 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630698417863 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539757484303 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142324575292 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437426302725 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.