Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “it is always better to study with a teacher than is to study alone”.
Due to the outbreak of the novel coronavirus, students suffered a lot as their study patterns is adversely affected. Due to the pandemic, the lectures were delivered via online mode. Some students were not able to understand things clearly and effectively, and due to these circumstances, they believe that it’s better to study alone than with a teacher. In my opinion, it is always better to study with a teacher. The reason behind my opinion is described in the following essay.
Firstly, studying with a teacher is always great. Only a teacher can find the strengths and weaknesses of the students. To reach the decisive point, feedback plays a crucial role and without a teacher, feedback is not possible. For instance, a student is preparing for an exam, doing self-study for 10 hours in a day, but in the mock tests, results aren’t up to the mark because the feedback is missing from his/her preparation, and only a teacher can help to know the weak zones.
Secondly, knowledge can be acquired from any medium either by self-study or by a teacher, but some intellectual values can only be learned from the experiences, and only a teacher can impart to the students. A teacher not only helps in study but also guides and motivates the student to become successful.
In conclusion, studying with a teacher is always better because it works as a feedback loop. Having feedback is the most efficient and effective way of studying.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 43.0788530466 26% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1977.66487455 61% => OK
No of words: 245.0 407.700716846 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88571428571 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79847641061 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 212.727598566 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534693877551 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 618.680645161 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0565747929 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0769230769 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352580409167 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151615093488 0.076458572812 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154137233916 0.0737576698707 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215670031309 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737447862508 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.