The alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine
The reading and the lecturer both are about the replacement of the automobile’s main source of power. While the author of the article argues that the alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine. The lecturer disputes the claims mentioned by the author. His position is that hydrogen-based fuel-cell engines cannot be an alternative source of energy.
According to the passage the author mentions that hydrogen-based fuel cells have several advantages over internal combustion engines. The IC engine relies on petroleum, either in the form of gasoline or diesel fuel. Petroleum is a finite resource and these resources are ephemeral. This particular argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that hydrogen is not so easily available. Hydrogen is available in the gas form, to use it as a fuel, it needs to convert to the pure liquid state which is practically difficult to produce.
Secondly, the author suggests that hydrogen fuel cells solve many of the world's pollution problems. He goes on to say that hydrogen fuel-cells byproduct is water whereas oil byproduct is carbon dioxide which is very harmful to the environment. The lecturer, however, asserts that hydrogen fuel cell is not solving any pollution problems because the process of conversion of hydrogen to a liquid state consists of burning coal and oil which creates lots of pollution.
Finally, the author puts forth the idea that hydrogen-based fuel cells will soon be competitive because they are less expensive. In contrast, the lecture’s stance is that hydrogen-based fuel cells are more expensive because they require Platinium to undergo a chemical reaction to produce energy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...t hydrogen fuel cells solve many of the worlds pollution problems. He goes on to say t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32462686567 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9753456194 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570895522388 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.238223726 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1333333333 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509831990557 0.272083759551 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160518828006 0.0996497079465 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164490197161 0.0662205650399 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304329258345 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154800137289 0.0443174109184 349% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.