Famous Dutch painter
The reading and the lecturer are both about the paintings of Rembrandt who is a famous painter of Dutch. While the author of the article argues that there are some problems with the paintings which are attributed to Rembrandt. The lecturer agrees with the author and claims that, it's true, after carefully examining the paintings wasn't part of the original paintings.
According to the reading, there is something different about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed. The article mentions that the woman in the painting is wearing a white linen cap which is very common among the servants, albeit, the fur coat she is wearing looks expensive and no servant could afford it. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that after carefully examining the paintings through x-ray analysis, indeed, the paintings weren’t part of the original. These are enhanced over the original paintings to increase the value of the paintings. The dress of the portrait looks different because the artist was trying to make it look formal.
Secondly, the author suggests that Rembrandt was the master of painting lights and shadows, but these elements were missing from the painting. Shadows and lights weren’t there where they have to be. The lecturer, however, asserts that original paintings do have light and shadow of the women’s portrait but when it was enhanced the feature was not able to match the light color of the face of the painting.
Finally, the author puts forth the idea that the Rembrandt painting style is too different, there is a problem with some paintings which are attributed to Rembrandt. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that they are enhanced by making some changes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...randt who is a famous painter of Dutch. While the author of the article argues that t...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...after carefully examining the paintings wasnt part of the original paintings. Accord...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... very common among the servants, albeit, the fur coat she is wearing looks expens...
^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...tributed to Rembrandt. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that they are enhanced by mak...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 284.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05281690141 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48708975578 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492957746479 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6196069814 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0589846649129 0.236089414692 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301595632348 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108741851689 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0437820215482 0.150856017488 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758326857796 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.