A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
The talent of students including their strengths and weaknesses can only be understood by a teacher. Some people think that a teacher should focus more on having exceptional topic knowledge rather than the ability to connect with students. In my opinion, a teacher’s ability to relate well with the students is imperative.
First and foremost, having excellent knowledge about the subject being taught is the one thing but if a teacher cannot relate to a student’s level of understanding, then that knowledge is unworthy. For instance, in the class of mathematics, a teacher lecturing students on some advanced topic which is not a cup of tea for the fifth-grade class students to grasp that extraordinary knowledge, and the teacher fails to understand that students aren’t able to understand the topic well then there is no use of teacher’s superior knowledge. Additionally, it’s not only demotivating the students but also ruining their mental health.
Additionally, every teacher has a different teaching style and not all can understand well. So it’s the teacher’s responsibility to use the teaching style which is convenient to all the students.
In Conclusion, knowledge is something that can be acquired either from books, articles, and many other resources but some intellectual values only can be learned from the experience and these values only the teacher can impart to the students. So, it’s imperative for a teacher to relate well with the students than have excellent knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... but also ruining their mental health. Additionally, every teacher has a different teaching...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 239.0 407.700716846 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33891213389 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05370543065 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 212.727598566 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502092050209 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.5341032943 48.9658058833 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.6 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452299385913 0.236089414692 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190118593393 0.076458572812 249% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127184205608 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265501365676 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121567900207 0.0645574589148 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.