Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Working in groups, is an important factor of our lives. No matter our field of expertise or working environment we need to collaborate with others to turn in successful assignments. Hence, many student and workers debate if it is better to stay as a regular member or become the leader of the group. I believe it is better to be a member of the group instead of becoming the leader. I will explain my reasoning in the following essay.
First, managing a group is a time consuming task. Leaders of a team need to understand and communicate with group members, delegate tasks, and make changes based on different situations, which may take a long time. For example, I led a group for an English assignment in my last year of university. At first I communicated with the members about their capabilities and then delegated tasks to each of them based on their answers. After a while two of the members asked for a different part because their current tasks were harder than they assumed, which led to me helping them to understand and finish their parts. Therefore, I had to spend more time covering for and helping my teammates so we could present an acceptable assignment.
Second, the leader is held accountable for all misdeeds. The leader of a group is responsible for all members and needs to make sure that the assigned work is done perfectly. So, whenever there is a mishap the one answering to the complaints and shouldering all the blame is the leader. For example, a friend of mine was the leader of a dance group. Her team had a member named Rose that didn't cooperate with her, she had to go around looking for her and dragging her to the practice room, encouraging her to keep on training. Later on despite her endeavors Rose did very badly on their assessment day and she was held accountable and shouted at, even though she tried her best and all the other members did pretty well. Likewise, the one answering to the complaints is the leader even if the failure is not their fault.
In conclusion, I believe it is better to be a member of the team rather than the leader. Because, leaders need to spend a lot more time and effort for each assignment than their fellow members and are held accountable for all losses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun student seems to be countable; consider using: 'many students'.
Suggestion: many students
... turn in successful assignments. Hence, many student and workers debate if it is better to s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
.... Her team had a member named Rose that didnt cooperate with her, she had to go aroun...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, likewise, look, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59398496241 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63828718925 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496240601504 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3340726755 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.65 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.95 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22844334611 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868091131347 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811781070664 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15863205335 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551615725157 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.