Do you agree or disagree with following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects to specialize in one specific subject.
During the last decades, human beings can take themselves apart from others in society through education. In fact, education has paved the way for further success. One of the heated debates in this realm is whether one should specialize in one or many different subjects. Although there might be some counterexamples for this claim, I argue that it is far better to be competent in many academic subjects. Following reasons will further elaborate on this issue.
The most prominent point to be mentioned is that studying a wide range of academic subjects has profound impacts on the future job which someone can land. In other words, one can broaden their horizons in this way. As a result, this person is able to find a practical solution for challenging situations by referring to his wide range of knowledge. It is an undoubted fact that employers prefer to hire someone who is capable of analyzing different aspects of a problem to arrive at the best decision. For instance, my colleague’s major was electrical engineering, and his minor was Italian literature. Although they might seem much different, he handled a significant meeting with our Italian customer using his broad knowledge in both majors.
My second rationale is rooted in the fact that some subjects can complement each other perfectly. Taking this situation into consideration, some subjects can become more effective when they are introduced beside other major or even majors. As a matter of fact, the world is based on some basic concepts that we cannot eliminate them from any subjects, and students who want to be an expert in their field of study should have enough knowledge in these basic fields also. Consider my own experience which can shed some light on this issue. I always was suffering from a lack of knowledge in chemistry subject as an electrical engineer. It may sound irrelevant, but when I was working on a project about batteries it was necessary for me to know about principal concepts of their chemical characteristics.
To wrap it up, based on the ideas that were presented above, I highly believe that people should not focus on only one academic subject to stand out in this crowded world. However, we cannot use this opinion as a prescription, and more studies are required to answer this question precisely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...whether one should specialize in one or many different subjects. Although there might be some ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... enough knowledge in these basic fields also. Consider my own experience which can s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
...ch can shed some light on this issue. I always was suffering from a lack of knowledge in c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ired to answer this question precisely.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, so, apart from, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79972937971 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583979328165 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0685690846 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.842105263 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3684210526 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161108902907 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469440188628 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482660984406 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949828858854 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193581985669 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.