TPO22_Integerated
The reading claims that ethanol fuel cannot be considered as a suitable alternative to gasoline. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
The author argues that ethanol fuel is not able to address the significant problem of global warming due to the carbon dioxide produced by gasoline. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that the process of growing plants from which ethanol fuel is made will contract the amount of carbon dioxide in the air. In fact, plants absorb carbon dioxide and remove it from the atmosphere.
Furthermore, the reading p
assage holds the view that large-scale production of ethanol fuel will reduce the amounts of plants which animals feed on them. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that, ethanol fuel is produced from parts of plants consist of cellulose and are not eaten by animals. As a result, ethanol fuel will not have any harmful effect on the amounts of available plants for animals.
Finally, the reading asserts that ethanol fuel is more costly compared to gasoline particularly without the support of the United States government. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that more production of ethanol fuel, more decrease in its cost. In this regard, the government should not cut its support so that they can produce more fuel, increase the number of consumers, and cause a drop in its price. According to the recent studies, in the future, the amounts of ethanol fuel will be three times greater, and its price would be forty percent less than now.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, in contrast, in fact, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98507462687 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47433923395 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8955357128 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429896071136 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163469813925 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714627374878 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193244482318 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115969184264 0.0443174109184 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.