TPO17_Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are.
During the last decades, the advertising industry has experienced significant changes thanks to the brand-new visual and acoustic technologies. In fact, the digital revolution paved the way for further progress in advertising. On the other hand, modern means of advertising have brought critical concerns with itself. One of the heated debates in this realm is that whether the majority of advertisements want to demonstrate products much better what they are. Although there might be some counterexamples about this claim, I would argue that most advertisements are deceiving the people. Following reasons will further elaborate on this issue.
The most prominent point to be mentioned is that this issue is bound to question the core aim of the advertisement industry. Admittedly, companies and producers' first purpose is to sell more amounts of their commodities, so quantity frequently is more important compared to the quality for sellers. In this regard, they tend to employ different methods and stimuli in their advertisements to promote people buying more products. Consider my own experience which can shed some light on this issue. A few years ago, I was working for an institution as an academic advisor as well as an advertiser. What's worse, my boss always made me introduce my students some sub-standard books and encourage them to buy those books during the TV show about this institution. However, I was sure those unqualified books were unnecessary for students, I had to ignore quality, and increase the number of books which were bought by the students.
The second rationale behind my idea is rooted in the fact that advertisements often exaggerate the product's attributes. Not to mention we are talking about an industry in which there are many experts who are analyzing their customers and their needs considering factors such as age, career, and location to utilize the best way for evoking them. In other words, they know how to deceive an individual by examining their personality. For example, most ads use fantasy or animation characters for young customers including children since they are not mature enough to distinguish between reality and imagination. Besides, they frequently use misleading sentences to cover their exaggeration given that they know that most people are not aware enough to understand their tricks.
To wrap it up, based on the reasons were presented above I argue that advertisements are mainly exaggerating their products to attract more customers which are exposed to their ads. Let us hope that more and more people particularly parents rely less on advertisements before making a decision about a product. In conclusion, there are other reliable ways such as asking our relatives about their experience with a product to become sure about what we want to buy.
Comments
you must be a writing teacher
you must be a writing teacher！awesome
even higher than the TPO model essay
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...demic advisor as well as an advertiser. Whats worse, my boss always made me introduce...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, talking about, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2376.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26829268293 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94277053595 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574279379157 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7024336283 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4761904762 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52380952381 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149889514909 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473184168975 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477159695906 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100046153629 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513084025306 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.