Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I agree with the notion that it is more beneficial to have broad knowledge about a subject rather than focusing on certain topic as it can create a situation which can limit the possibilities of both knowledge and career. Let us better understand and absorb the idea how obtaining a wider range of knowledge can be beneficial to a person. First and foremost, learning a wide range of concepts in any field of knowledge can help a learner to be more practical and useful to others all while avoiding redundancy due to too much specialization. For instance, it can be seen that in the long term a professional such as a chemical engineer or a doctor will benefit more from having known a wider range of concepts and ideas rather than specializing too much and missing out on certain information which is considered to be basic by most others. This will eliminate the possibility of the person's occupation going entirely extinct. Therefore, a chemical engineer learns all sorts of topics from valve operations to discoveries of new methods of generating energy or novel sources of energy. Such a profession always requires and challenges the individual to be aware of as many things as possible since these roles can be very demanding and only a few percent of the population ever have the capacity or the will to take up such roles with harsh working conditions. Further, a doctor needs to know about as much medicinal treatments as possible to be able to treat a wide variety of patients and thus serve the society better, rather than specializing in certain type of surgery which can lead to a dearth of doctors in the world who can treat a common disease effectively. Secondly, the process is obtaining knowledge is also dependent upon the amount of interest shown by the person towards learning in-depth about a topic, which generally tends to go lower as one progresses through any concept due to the increasing complexity and the lack of novelty. This leads to inefficiency of learning and often boredom takes over the control and the learner tends to lose patients. But, if the opposite is done and the learning is continued only till it is practical and deep enough and then is then switched with another subject and so on, then the total amount of useful information learnt will be significantly higher and also the memory and interest in learning will be boosted in such a case. It is therefore clear why many people do not pursue higher levels of education even if they have the resources to do so. For example, school education includes all kinds of subjects and topics and not just one subject is taught to any student for his entire school life. This is because the relation between the depth of knowledge and the practicality of its application is inversely proportional. Therefore, it will be viable to conclude that learning in a specific stream should be discontinued after a certain time to pursue other streams.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 885, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...s will eliminate the possibility of the persons occupation going entirely extinct. Ther...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2425.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 505.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80198019802 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77120912946 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512871287129 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 782.1 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.5269946508 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.666666667 100.406767564 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6666666667 20.6045352989 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158484848762 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051449744407 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458523543942 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158484848762 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 11.7677419355 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.