Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As one of the basic needs of humans, the matter of settlement has always been an important one. One of the most debated subjects is whether should we settle down in a city for life or move from place to place. Personally, moving from place to place is more beneficial as it brings forth new opportunities and people can gain a better understanding of the world.
Firstly, moving from place to place helps people gain a better understanding of the world. A variety in settlements enables people to be able to learn new skills and knowledge in such areas. For example, if a man moved to a farm, he would be able to learn the skills needed to work and live on such a farm such as milking cows, grooming the horses, and cleaning the stables, etc. Therefore, by moving to another place, not only did he manage to successfully increase his skillset but he also gained valuable knowledge about his newfound settlement. Furthermore, people can learn more thoroughly the culture of a place by living there. By moving from one place to another, people can gain vast knowledge about the cultures of the world. For instance, in many countries, nodding usually signals affirmation. However, in India, the opposite is true. This and many other cultural differences can only be learned and felt by living in these areas and fully embracing their culture. Therefore, by moving from one place to another, people can learn new skills and gain knowledge about the world not only naturally but also spiritually.
Secondly, not tying down to a specific area can open up various opportunities for people. Moving to these new places enables us to meet new people, inducing many new exciting opportunities to make important connections. These can vary from simple friends to important business partners, all of which can be significant to one’s life. Moreover, introducing oneself to a new environment can provide many new opportunities for a more satisfactory position in life. More specifically, if a man moves to a place that has more of a demand for his specific job, he naturally has a better chance of encountering a more satisfactory job offer. With a more satisfactory job, he will be able to support his life more comfortably. This matter is even more critical in cities such as New York, which has an especially high living cost and little demand for more workforce. Therefore, by moving to new places, people can encounter new opportunities both socially and economically.
In conclusion, I think that it is highly beneficial for people to not tie themselves down in a specific town and explore their options by moving from place to place as it helps them learn new skills, gain more knowledge about the world around them and provide themselves with new opportunities both socially and economically.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2322.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90909090909 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87155742897 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437632135307 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.874490402 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.545454545 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188787224469 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699455529286 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551946871429 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144540781994 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549162635558 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.