I do not completely agree with the statement that we should use printed material rather than online information while doing research work. Today, students in most of the universities and college around the globe are required to submit some sort of research work or project as part of the curriculum. Research works are generally focussed towards modifying the existing works, analyzing the latest developments in that area and predicting their application. Using only printed materials has some advantages as well as some disadvantages
First, printed materials are not always up-to-date. In other words, even the famous research journals who frequently receive research papers from various sources publish them after several months or sometimes may take a year to print a new volume. For example, when I was doing my research work, I found out that most of the latest developments in that area were not available in printed form; rather it was easily available in the websites of the various journals. Therefore, it is better to check about the latest developments from the internet before starting the research work.
However, using printed materials generally ensures the reader that the mentioned information is taken from a reliable source, whereas while referring to the information present on the internet one must be careful about the reliability of that source because, nowadays, even amateurs who are not the experts of the subject, post some critical information on the internet. If these pieces of information would be used in the research work, then the work would not be credible.
Thus I would recommend using both printed material as well as online information while doing research work. Printed materials provide the basic information in any subject that one would require while doing research, and reliable online sources tell us about the latest developments in that subject. It is clear that having both the things would certainly make the work more fruitful both for the writer as well as society in future developments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...then the work would not be credible. Thus I would recommend using both printed ma...
^^^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...d recommend using both printed material as well as online information while doing research...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... work more fruitful both for the writer as well as society in future developments.
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 447, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...well as society in future developments.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, sort of, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27828746177 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72987128861 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522935779817 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.5063945899 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.833333333 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 5.45110844103 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248527508497 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109683907377 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103002818829 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162529128108 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568315481998 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.