Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Finding the proper content for a research is very important. While some people may say that internet has a lot of advantages and is better than printed material, others might disagree. In my view, internet has a lot of advantages over printed material and I am going to explain why.
First, internet is easily accessible. Internet allows researchers to access loads of resources and articles anywhere and anytime. It also enables them to browse more quickly and efficiently and with less time spent on commuting to libraries, they can spend their time on their research. Also, the intelligence of the algorythms can help them find related materials and articles more easily. For example, during the months that I had to do my thesis research, I used a lot of online resources. At first I tried the university libraries, but there were a lot of problems. First, I couldn’t find many of the books that I wanted because other students had borrowed them. Second, I had to spend a lot of time searching between rows of books and remain quiet te whole time which was quite tiring and frustrating. As a result, I decided to limit the number of paper book resources and instead use the internet to find what I was looking for. And it turned out to be more efficient, since I could easily find them while at home. Also I found a lot of books and metrials which were completely new and I discovered them with the help of the algorythms used in search engines. As you can see, my work accelerated because of internet and I did not need to spend a lot of time searching.
Second, internet doesn’t have as much of an environmental impact. It does not use paper and as a result, no trees have to be cut down. The environmental impact of using internet is much less than compared to using the old-fashioned paper books. No paper factories are needed and no carbon emissions are made. No habitats need to be destroyed or forests wiped out. For example, I just read an article online, stating that for every 8 average sized books produced, one tree is cut. So, you can see that producing paper books is a huge cost and a very inefficient way, but the internet has no such cost.
In sum, I believe that internet has contributed a lot to the field of research. By providing countless numbers of materials and resources to researchers, enabling them to do their research without the need of transportation and also by having less destructive impacts on nature and natural resources. I strongly believe that researchers should use the internet more often, and in general, it is a good idea that people should reduce their use of paper books and use online books more often.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
Finding the proper content for a research is very important. While some people ma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1027, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...I could easily find them while at home. Also I found a lot of books and metrials whi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he algorythms used in search engines. As you can see, my work accelerated because...
^^
Line 13, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tless numbers of materials and resources to researchers, enabling them to do thei...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, may, second, so, while, for example, in general, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70425531915 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72401921248 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485106382979 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3619341908 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.44 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271137542307 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723905852742 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620274783452 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167988625833 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412223768894 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.