Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is difficult for a teacher to be both popular (well-liked) and effective in helping students in learning.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is difficult for a
teacher to be both popular (well-liked) and effective in helping students in
learning.
Whether a popular teacher cannot be effective in assisting students in learning, and vice versa, arouses a heated debate. As for me, I fully agree that it is extremely challenging for educators to strike a balance between effectiveness and popularity. My reasons are as follows.
Students, in general, prefer energetic teachers as opposed to strict teachers. In other words, if a teacher wants to become popular and being liked by pupils, they need to sacrifice being strict to students. As a result, students' learning efficiency will undoubtedly deteriorate significantly. Take my middle school music teacher as an example. My music teacher wanted to be friendly toward her students. She frequently spotted her students spacing out and gossiping during the class, but owing to the fact that my music teacher wanted to maintain her popularity, she chose to tolerate her students' misbehaviors. Unfortunately, since most students were unattentive throughout the entire lecture, nobody had gotten a score higher than B-minus on their final exams. Contrarily, my high school math teacher, Mr. Lieu, was exceptionally strict; he required his students to do ten diabolical math problems every week. Thus, even though most of his pupils performed well on their midterm math exams, every student, including me, portrayed him as an unforgettable evil villain. Evidently, it is a dillema for an educator to find a balance between populairy and learning productivity.
Conspicuously, the quality of teaching materials is highly related to students' studying efficiency, but once a lecturer becomes popular, he/she might incorporate amusing yet unrelated contents into the material. As a result, the decrease of the course quality will undoubtedly result in students' worsening effectiveness. As an example, my father is a high school history teacher. One day, my father bumped into a research paper stating that the degree of funny facts in an educator's teaching materials is significantly proportinate to an educator's popularity, so he decided to include intriguing historical facts into his history notes. Nevertheless, students were too obsessed with these funny historical stories that they tend to forgot the important historical facts that the should have learned. That is, students have problems identifying which section of the history material is essential to their study. Eventually, even though my father become popular in his school, most of his students perform incredibly terrible.
In conclusion, I completely agree that being poplar and helping students become effective is contradictory due to the aforementioned reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 539, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'educators'' or 'educator's'?
Suggestion: educators'; educator's
...als is significantly proportinate to an educators popularity, so he decided to include in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, as for, in conclusion, in general, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2376.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53846153846 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06313574162 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561771561772 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 743.4 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.794995149 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.304347826 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.652173913 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39130434783 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368197984393 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112132069058 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140717288435 0.0737576698707 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29927258359 0.150856017488 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189210618234 0.0645574589148 293% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.